Trump administration considers pro-family policies to boost declining birthrates, counter left-wing agenda
By lauraharris // 2025-04-24
Copy
 
  • The Trump administration is exploring financial incentives, education reforms and symbolic recognition (e.g., a "National Medal of Motherhood") to encourage higher birth rates and promote conservative family values.
  • The U.S. fertility rate dropped to a record low of 1.62 births per woman in 2023, well below the 2.1 replacement level needed to sustain the population.
  • Key proposals include a $5,000 "baby bonus" for new mothers, diverting Fulbright scholarships to married applicants and federal funding for fertility education.
  • While proponents (like Vice President J.D. Vance and tech mogul Elon Musk) argue declining birth rates threaten economic stability, critics warn cash incentives could worsen poverty cycles without broader economic reforms.
  • The administration plans to expand IVF access, but the issue divides conservatives due to ethical objections over embryo destruction.
The Trump administration is evaluating a series of proposals encouraging Americans to marry and have more children to reverse declining birth rates and promote conservative family values. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) provisional data, the total fertility rate, the average number of children a woman is expected to have in her lifetime, dropped to 1.62 births per woman in 2023, a two percent decline from 2022. This marks the lowest rate since the federal government began tracking fertility data in the 1930s, falling well below the replacement-level rate of 2.1 births needed to sustain the population. The U.S. fertility rate peaked during the post-World War II baby boom, exceeding three births per woman, before steadily declining in the 1960s and 1970s. After stabilizing near replacement level for decades, it has plummeted since 2007, when it hit 2.12 births per woman, just before the financial crisis. (Related: DEPOPULATION: American women are giving birth at record-low rates as fertility falls to 1.62 births per woman in 2023.) As a response, the administration is reportedly having early discussions on reversing this trend through financial incentives, education reforms and symbolic recognition for large families. Reported key proposals include a one-time $5,000 cash payment to mothers after giving birth, modeled after successful programs in countries like South Korea; reversing 30 percent of Fulbright scholarships for married applicants or parents, incentivizing family formation among young adults; federal funding for fertility education, including menstrual cycle tracking to aid conception; and a "National Medal of Motherhood" for women who bear six or more children. Vice President J.D. Vance, a vocal advocate for pro-natal policies, has championed the effort, aligning with Republican lawmakers and influential figures like Elon Musk, who has repeatedly warned about the economic and cultural dangers of falling birthrates. Furthermore, the administration is also preparing a report, due in May, to expand access to in vitro fertilization (IVF), though the issue has sparked tensions with religious conservatives who oppose the procedure on ethical grounds.

"Baby bonus" proposal sparks debate on incentives, welfare and family structure

The series of proposals, specifically the "baby bonus" program, ignited heated discussions on X, formerly known as Twitter. Advocates argue that declining birth rates threaten economic stability; however, as skepticism runs deep, critics warn that unrestricted cash incentives could worsen poverty cycles and family breakdowns. "The 'baby bonus' must apply only to married women," one X user posted, along with the retweet from another X user named Tony Heller. who referenced historical precedents where welfare payments allegedly encouraged out-of-wedlock births and dependency. "In the 1960's Congress came up with a plan to pay single mothers to have more children. The more children they had out of wedlock, the more money they received. The destruction of poor families was done quite intentionally by the US government, under the name 'social justice.'" Many also insist that any "baby bonus" should be restricted to married couples or those who can financially and morally support children. "Incentives without responsibility worsen the problem," one user tweeted. Another argued, "Only people who've never relied on government assistance should qualify." Some suggest that broader economic reforms, not welfare-style incentives, are the real solution. "No. Adopt policies that boost the value of the dollar and lower the cost of living, and you'll get that baby boom. This 'baby bonus' was tried before with unmarried welfare mothers, and all we got was more unmarried welfare mothers and more children locked in the poverty cycle," one said. Learn more about declining populations across the world at PopulationCollapse.com. Watch this episode of "Light Listening" discussing the reasons behind the sharp decline in U.S. births.
This video is from The Lightbulb Initiative channel on Brighteon.com.

More related stories:

DEPOPULATION: Maternity wards across America are closing down as birth rates collapse.

Hospitals across the U.S. closing down MATERNITY WARDS due to staff shortages, low birth rates.

Over HALF of America's 24,295 cities could experience MAJOR DEPOPULATION by 2100. Census Bureau: U.S. population projected to begin declining by 2100. Sources include: Modernity.news WSJ.com NYTimes.com Brighteon.com
Copy